Some of these types, not necessarily the larger denominations, were rarely struck and therefore these can be valuable. The most important denominations issued during the Imperial period are as follows. The Romans used various types of coins, some more common than others. Whether these silver, silvered, or bronze/copper alloy coins are a good investment depends on other features, such as the ones below. Some silver and bronze coins with an intact silver wash can be very valuable as well. At Catawiki different kinds of aurei in medium and high grades have sold for thousands of euros. Roman gold coins have become even more valuable over the past decades. Our expert has shared the top 10 features to pay attention to when buying a Roman coin. Roman coins reveal just a fraction of ancient culture, but there is another good reason to start collecting Roman coins: they can be very valuable and a good investment. As you examine an ancient coin, remember that the coin you hold has survived the dark ages, the golden age and both world wars. Holding a 2000 year old Roman coin is holding a piece of history in your hand. All rights reserved.In collaboration with Willem Knapen - Ancient Coins Expert ™ & © 2022 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. “For understanding the dying days of Roman power in the Province of Dacia, and the history of Romania, he is potentially more significant, but our results have just been published and the academic debate is just beginning.” He said that the researchers wanted to start a conversation with Roman historians and archaeologists to try and test their hypothesis about Sponsian. Pearson, however, insisted the researchers had reached “a clear-cut conclusion” about the authenticity of the coins, telling CNN in an email: “For the grand history of Rome, Sponsian is little more than a historical footnote – but a footnote that should nevertheless be reinstated!” ![]() “This whole theory - that the coin is genuine - is both unscientific and unfounded,” he added.ĭame Mary Beard, the acclaimed scholar of Ancient Rome and professor of classics at Cambridge University, wrote in a blog post published by the Times Literary Supplement that “there is still very powerful evidence that they are fakes,” going on to list a number of issues surrounding their crafting and design. “Like everyone in the numismatic world, I strongly believe this coin to be a modern forgery,” Jerome Mairat, curator of the Heberden Coin Room in the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, England, told CNN. The researchers added that while “nothing can be known about him for certain,” the coins analyzed “provide clues as to his possible place in history.”ĭespite the study’s findings, some experts, including in the field of numismatics - the study or collection of currency - still believe the coin to be fake. The Sponsian coinage series was used to pay senior soldiers and officials, who kept them as a store of wealth, proposed the researchers.įrom the findings, it “would appear to be that Sponsian should be rehabilitated as a historical personage,” the study concluded. Sponsian never controlled an official mint or ruled Rome, said the researchers, but possibly became a local commander-in-chief who took charge during a period of chaos and civil war to protect the population of Dacia. The province of Dacia, which was cut off from the rest of the Roman empire in around 260 AD, was a region prized for its gold mines and mineral resources, according to UCL.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |